The statistics say it all. Nearly 50% of all first marriages and over 60% of all second marriages end in divorce. In the majority of family breakups, over 80% of the time, it is the wife who initiates separation and divorce, and if there are children in the family, she also usually removes the children with her. The family court then rewards the wife by giving her custody of the children in 85% of the time, as well as giving her a hefty (up to 95%+) share of the property.
Yet, everyone knows that it takes two people to make a relationship work and likewise, it takes two people to break it. When a relationship like a marriage is on the rocks, usually both parties are equally at fault. But the family court rejects this notion and automatically punishes the father, at least in 85% of cases, by removing custody of the children from the father and awarding the lion’s share of the property settlement to the wife (anywhere from 65% to 95%+).
The effects of divorce and fatherlessness are all too obvious. As V.I. Lenin said “When you destroy the family, you destroy society”. Divorce and fatherlessness destroy children, they destroy those spouses left without their children and in fact they destroy both spouses because neither of them resolve the issues that led to their relationship breakup in the first place, so that they come to repeat exactly the same mistakes in their subsequent relationships.
The solution to the evil that is divorce and fatherlessness lies in the reformation of the family court system. The courts, instead of rewarding those spouses who desert their marriage, must punish them by the automatic loss of custody of their children as well as by significantly reducing their share of the property settlement. This is not something that feminists would want to hear and encourage. But only these actions will stem this tide of evil and curse on society that is divorce and fatherlessness.